<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Shepherd &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardshepherd.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardshepherd.com</link>
	<description>Making the web. Better looking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO &#8211; Fishing or hunting?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardshepherd.com/seo-fishing-or-hunting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardshepherd.com/seo-fishing-or-hunting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richardshepherd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardshepherd.com/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick thought: Search Engine Optimisation, in the wrong hands, can turn into fishing. I had a conversation recently about generating a keyword rich page in a highly competitive space. Even if we didn&#8217;t get page one, or two, or three of Google, some people might find the site and then, perhaps, might decide to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick thought:</p>
<p>Search Engine Optimisation, in the wrong hands, can turn into <em><strong>fishing</strong></em>.</p>
<p>I had a conversation recently about generating a keyword rich page in a highly competitive space. Even if we didn&#8217;t get page one, or two, or three of Google, <em>some </em>people might find the site and then, perhaps, might decide to buy some products.</p>
<p>Really? Would they? Sounds like fishing to me. We&#8217;re dropping our bait into an incredibly busy river (there are LOTS of fishermen here!) hoping that a fish might not only see our bait, but also like it. Like it more than all the other bait they&#8217;ve seen already.</p>
<p>The first problem with this approach is that it is almost infinite. You could create &#8216;keyword rich&#8217; (ooh, I hate that phrase) pages for all of your products and services, <em>and</em> their related phrases, and hope that some of them get noticed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no denying that this can and does work. It&#8217;s a tried and trusted formula for limited success. My main problem with it, however, is that it is not <em>user centric</em>. We are not asking the question, &#8220;what do our users expect to find when they search for that phrase&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example, if we were a tennis ball manufacturer we could create a page for the phrase &#8220;Wimbledon 2009&#8243;. Granted, some people searching that phrase might want to buy tennis balls &#8211; but the chances are they want information on the tournament. We could even include some wonderful keyword rich paragraphs about Wimbledon but, unless we&#8217;re Slazenger, it&#8217;s unlikely this text will be of value for the user.</p>
<p>Another example might be a car insurance provider optimising for &#8216;Toyota Prius&#8217;, because the person searching either  has a car or is about to buy one. Surely they&#8217;ll need car insurance at some point too? Maybe, but that&#8217;s <em>not</em> what they&#8217;re searching for!</p>
<p>I guess that doesn&#8217;t stop car insurers sponsoring motor shows, but isn&#8217;t a point of the online marketing that we can accurately target people and their interests?</p>
<p>There is also a (please don&#8217;t run away here) moral issue. Google is, in many ways, a victim of it&#8217;s own success. As SEOs try to keep up with the algorithm, and websites vie for a page one ranking, all kinds of SEO&#8217;d content is being created which can be of no use to users. What use is a visitor to you and your site? Vanity? Ego? Would you rather have 1000 visitors who don&#8217;t convert or 10 visitors who do?</p>
<p>How many results on page one of Google are directly targeting your search phrase, and how many have been SEO&#8217;d to appear there?</p>
<p>This, my friends, is fishing. If you have the time, go nuts. But there are far better things to do. Seriously. You need to get out more.</p>
<p>Throw away your rod, get up off the riverbank, and go <em><strong>hunting</strong></em>.</p>
<p>You know who your prey are &#8211; <em>people who want to buy tennis balls</em>. Optimise for phrases like &#8216;tennis balls&#8217; and &#8216;buy tennis balls&#8217; (or whatever your keyword research suggests). It&#8217;ll be much easier to get a good result on Google, and it&#8217;s likely you&#8217;ll enjoy much higher conversion rates.</p>
<p>So sling your shotgun over your arm and spend your SEO time more effectively. Don&#8217;t waste time competing with the BBC&#8217;s coverage of Wimbledon and settling for a page 3 or page 4 result. Go deep and long with your phrases and links, and (last pun coming up) your conversion rates will be an ACE.</p>
<p>That was shocking, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardshepherd.com/seo-fishing-or-hunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
